Skip to main content
· 3/22/2006

Speck v. Spadafore

Citations

  • 895 A.2d 606
  • 2006 Pa. Super. 57
  • 2006 Pa. Super. LEXIS 248

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • cting Swope v. Swope, 689 A.2d 264, 265 (Pa. Super. 1997)
  • “Children of the same family, the same blood, with the same first associations and habits, have some means of enjoyment in their power, which no subsequent connections can supply....”
  • “Children of the same family, the same blood, with the same first associations and habits, have some means of enjoyment in their power, which no subsequent connections can supply ....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Bowes, Panella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.