Specialties Development Corp. v. Randolph Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the law will not be enforced on the high seas against a foreign nation’s vessels without that nation’s consent”
• explaining that the distribution of narcotics may be prohibited under the protective principle
• relying on the protective principle to reject defendants’ arguments that applying the predecessor to the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (the “MDLEA”
• relying on the protective principle to reject defendants’ arguments that applying the predecessor to the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (the “MDLEA”
• \[i]t is misleading ... to consider ... consent an element of the offense \ (emphasis in original)
• \/z/t is misleading ... to consider ... consent an element of the offense \ (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).