Special Situations Fund III, L.P. v. American Dental Partners, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying class action tolling as to the § 18 claim because “[a]mong other differences, a § 10(b) claim requires that a plaintiff prove that a defendant acted with scienter, while under § 18, the state of mind with which the defendant acted enters the case instead as a defense”
• “District courts are not bound to follow the decisions of other district courts.”
• \District courts are not bound to follow the decisions of other district courts.\
• “District courts are not bound to follow the decisions of other district courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).