Spears' Administrator v. Greer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Dudenhoeffer “appears to have raised the bar for plaintiffs seeking to bring a claim based on a breach of the duty of prudence” (internal quotation marks omitted) (emphasis removed)
• noting that Dudenhoeffer “appears to have raised the bar for plaintiffs seeking to bring a claim based on a breach of the duty of prudence” (internal quotation marks omitted) (emphasis removed)
• “Neither Dudenhoeffer nor Tibbie permits ERISA claims to withstand challenge based on such threadbare allegations” that the defendants did not monitor ESOP investments
• “It is true of course, as Tibb/e reminds us, that ERISA fiduciaries bear a ‘continuous duty’ to monitor the prudence of investments.”
• “The duty to monitor claim against Fuld fails because the TCAC fails to allege plausibly any primary breach of fiduciary duty on the part of the Plan Committee Defendants.”
• “The duty to monitor claim against Fuld fails because the TCAC fails to allege plausibly any primary breach of fiduciary duty on the part of the Plan Committee Defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).