Spearman v. State Security Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing Ill. Rev. Stat. c. 73, § 1065.96 (1975), which is substantially similar to G. L. c. 175D, § 9
• mere filing of uninsured motorist claim followed by carrier’s disclaimer of coverage does not amount to “exhaus tion”; the claim must proceed to arbitration
• mere filing of uninsured motorist claim followed by carrier’s disclaimer of coverage does not amount to “exhaustion”; the claim must proceed to arbitration
• court held that section 546(a) makes it clear that an insured must first proceed under any rights conferred by the insurance policy before the Fund is required to pay
• court held that section 546(a) makes it clear that an insured must first proceed under any rights conferred by the insurance policy before the Fund is required to pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).