Spearman Industries, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying plaintiff’s motion to compel reserve file as irrelevant to first-party bad faith claim
• stating, in a similar way, that “the moving party may show that the object or condition at issue is destroyed or has deteriorated after the non-testifying expert observes it but before the moving party’s expert has an opportunity to observe it
• “The rejection of expert testimony is the exception rather than the rule, and ‘the trial court’s role as gatekeeper is not intended to serve as a replacement for the adversary system.’ ”
• relied upon by Plaintiffs at Doc. 418, at 8

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).