Speake v. Barrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “dereliction of duty is an offense ‘closely-related’ to violating a lawful general order under the facts of this case”
• affirming our court’s decision that Article 92(3), UCMJ, was an LIO in part because it was “closely related” to Article 92(1), UCMJ
• prosecuting bigamy, even though specified bigamy elements not met
• prosecuting bigamy, even though specified bigamy elements not met
• affirming conviction for a “closely related” and less severe offense
• affirming conviction for a “closely related” and less severe offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).