Skip to main content

Spayd v. Ringing Rock Lodge

Citations

  • 270 Pa. 67
  • 113 A. 70
  • 14 A.L.R. 1443
  • 1921 Pa. LEXIS 324

Syllabus

<p>Beneficial associations—By-laius—Restriction on right of petition to governmental powers — Delegation of rights—Constitutional law—Bill of rights—Equity—Act of June 16, 18S6, P. L. 784.</p> <p>1. The by.-laws of a beneficial association, will be enforced only when they ’are reasonable.</p> <p>2. Such by-laws cannot be adjudged reasonable, when they would compel the citizen to lose his property rights in accumulated assets, or forego the exercise of other rights which are constitutionally inviolable.</p> <p>3. The right to petition “those invested with powers of government for redress of grievances,” provided for in the Pennsylvania bill of rights, cannot be infringed, even momentarily by individuals, by the state itself, by the courts or minor tribunals, or by corporations and unincorporated associations which function only by the grace of the State, and the “supervision and control” of which are specifically vested in courts of equity by the Act of June 16,1836, par. 5, see. 13, P. L. 784.</p> <p>4. A provision in the by-laws of a beneficial association of railroad trainmen, which provides for the expulsion of a member, if he uses his “influence to defeat any action by the national legislative representative” of the association, is void in so far as it restricts the right of a member to petition the legislature to repeal an act of assembly. Such right cannot be surrendered by the member himself, or delegated to another, even temporarily.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • freedom of expression and freedom to petition issues arising in context of rule imposed by labor association
  • freedom of expression and freedom to petition issues arising in context of rule imposed by labor association
  • private union could not expel member for signing petition unfavorable to union interests
  • freedom of speech “cannot lawfully be infringed, even momentarily”; “a temporary giving up or denial of an inalienable right . . . is as void as though permanent in character”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feazee, Moschziskeb, Moschziskee, Scháeeee, Simpson, Walling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Spayd v. Ringing Rock Lodge

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.