Spaulding v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion that the father’s motivations for restricting grandparent visitation were selfish
• finding the trial court’s order for the grandparents to be able to send written-' communications to the child without paréntal interference was overly broad as it “borrowfed] language wholesale from the Parenting Guidelines” and “erroneously treatfed] [grandparents as if they were parents”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).