Spaulding v. Pepper
Citations
- 73 Kan. 644
- 85 P. 754
- 1906 Kan. LEXIS 300
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Master and Servant — Action for Wages — -Forfeiture—Pleading and Proof.' In an action for the recovery of wages and expenses under a contract of hiring, an answer which merely disputes the length of time the plaintiff was in the defendant’s service and pleads payment is insufficient to authorize a forfeiture of all compensation on the ground of dishonesty and other flagrant misconduct.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- involving an injunction prohibiting the sale of chattels that had already been sold
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.