Spaulding Composites Co. v. Aetna Cas. and Surety Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that provisions inconsistent with the pro rata methodology are not enforceable as a matter of New Jersey public policy
• reinforcing primacy of Owens-Illinois 's policy goals when rejecting enforcement of non-cumulation clause in CGL policy
• applying Owens-Illinois continuous trigger theory and Carter-Wallace vertical loss allocation by loss to invalidate a non-cumulation clause in context of cleanup of hazardous lead-containing waste
• rejecting “non-cumulation” clause that would have precluded “continuous trigger” coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).