Skip to main content
· 5/6/1997

Spartan Mills v. Bank of America Illinois

Citations

  • 112 F.3d 1251
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 9998
  • 30 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 979
  • 1997 WL 222818

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “this is not the case where [the creditor] was caught by surprise because of a lack of due process notice”
  • Holding that Spartan Mills could not now litigate issues relating to its lien as “Spartan Mills apparently determined that it would litigate its claim at a different time and in a different court. But in doing so, it left standing final orders that adjudicated its lien claim.”
  • application of Celotex principle barring collateral attack depends on “bankruptcy court ... jurisdiction over [the debtor] and its assets”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murnaghan, Niemeyer, Motz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.