Sparks v. Ritter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiffs state law claims, premised on defendant’s use of PHO in its food product, were preempted by the Final Determination and the 2016 CAA, and dismissing the claims without leave to amend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).