Sparks v. Regional Medical Center Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where “alleged misconduct consisted only of sexual comments and jokes directed at plaintiff, offensive language, and instances of rough conduct, . . . [t]his type of conduct is more representative of hostile work environment sexual harassment”
• discussing the responsibilities of an employer whose independent contractor was harassing employee
• “The evidence clearly establishes that [supervisor] never demanded sexual favors from plaintiff as a quid pro quo for job benefits nor made submission to sexual conduct a term or condition of plaintiff’s employment.”
• medical center may be hable for sexual misconduct of independent contractor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).