Sparks v. Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant’s statements to plaintiffs regarding the seizure and sale of their home merely placed them on notice of the debt collector’s valid options
• finding phone calls to be “in connection with the collection of [a] debt” where “[t]he raison d’etre of Strine’s communications with plaintiffs was to secure payment of Glover’s debts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).