Sparks v. King (In Re King)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that leaving personal property and trash in a rental unit was not a willful and malicious injury under § 523(a)(6
• holding that ad-missions by debtor established that land-lord’s case was substantially justified
• holding that leaving personal property and trash in a rental property was not a willful and malicious injury, nor was the fact that the debtor punched holes in the walls with his fist when that act was not done with the purpose of causing harm to the landlord
• finding fees should not be awarded under 7 § 523(d) because creditor also brought a claim under §523(a)(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).