Sparks v. Bledsaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• there is no abuse of discretion in refusing to give an instruction on a subject which is adequately covered by another instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Tripp, Inc. v. Kenneth A. Murray Insurance, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-10-12· cited 5×

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Primm v. Primm
  California Supreme Court· 1956-06-28· cited 243×
• Berniker v. Berniker
  California Supreme Court· 1947-07-08· cited 197×
• Utz v. Aureguy
  California Court of Appeal· 1952-03-19· cited 100×
• Key v. McCabe
  California Supreme Court· 1960-10-27· cited 37×
• People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Alexander
  California Court of Appeal· 1963-01-18· cited 27×
• Chandler v. Hibberd
  California Court of Appeal· 1958-11-12· cited 26×
• French v. Brinkman
  California Supreme Court· 1963-12-03· cited 24×
• Lipka v. Lipka
  California Supreme Court· 1963-11-19· cited 23×
• People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Bond
  California Court of Appeal· 1964-12-22· cited 17×
• Hodges v. Severns
  California Court of Appeal· 1962-03-08· cited 17×
• Ray v. Jackson
  California Court of Appeal· 1963-08-20· cited 15×
• Van Cise v. Lencioni
  California Court of Appeal· 1951-08-29· cited 14×
• Connor v. Pacific Greyhound Lines
  California Court of Appeal· 1951-06-14· cited 14×
• Mapes v. Yowell
  California Supreme Court· 1960-05-24· cited 7×
• Mears v. Mears
  California Court of Appeal· 1962-03-16· cited 7×
• Gong v. Firemen's Insurance
  California Court of Appeal· 1962-04-23· cited 7×
• Gibson v. Cobb
  California Court of Appeal· 1965-07-30· cited 7×
• Gress v. Rousseau
  California Court of Appeal· 1962-05-28· cited 5×
• Nordin v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1962-04-24· cited 4×