Skip to main content
· 12/30/2014

Sparkman Learning Center v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Citations

  • 775 F.3d 993
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 24553
  • 2014 WL 7388160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that very little evidence is required to raise a genuine issue of fact regarding motive and concluding that summary judgment on the merits is ordinarily inappropriate once a prima facie case has been established
  • “Applying Arkansas law, we conclude that [the newly-added plaintiff] is in privity with [the original plaintiff organization] as its executive director .... Therefore, the fifth element of claim preclusion is satisfied even with the addition of new parties.”
  • “It is well established that claim-splitting is discouraged. All claims must be brought together, and cannot be parsed out to be heard by different courts.”
  • Litigants may \not bring claims before a federal court that were already fully decided by state courts in what would amount to appellate review of the state court ruling.\ (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Smith, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.