Spangler v. Holthusen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that damages for the loss of future resale profits could not be recovered because defendant’s general knowledge that plaintiff developed land was insufficient to place defendant on notice
• holding that lost profits from a proposed collateral sale arising after execution of the real estate sales contract could not be imposed upon the sellers of the real estate when the collateral sale was unknown to the sellers
• land developer could not recover from seller lost profits on future sales agreement which seller did not know of
• sellers with general knowledge that buyer was land developer and might sell part of the farm conveyed were not charged with knowledge that developer would assign his interest in the contract, only two weeks after the contract was executed, for a $153,250 profit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).