Skip to main content
· 12/8/1922

Spangler v. Corless

Citations

  • 61 Utah 88
  • 211 P. 692
  • 28 A.L.R. 72
  • 1922 Utah LEXIS 79

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an injunction preventing the destruction of evidence was unnecessary given the duty to preserve evidence
  • “The SCA provides that a successful plaintiff may recover ‘actual damages suffered by the plaintiff and any profits made by the violator as a result of the violation’ as well as ‘punitive damages’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corfman, Frick, Gideon, Thurman, Weber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.