Spalding v. ZATZ

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the claim of “surprise” testimony in that case might also be viewed as an issue of attorney misconduct
• finding no prejudice where the objecting party was prepared to address the claimed “surprise” testimony with his own contrary evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).