Spahr v. Brady

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he movant’s argument is predicated upon the alleged misconduct of the law clerk, and not the court. Even if this argument had any validity, then it is the law clerk, and not the judge, to whom recusal should be directed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).