Spafford v. Coats

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a female unmarried cohabitant who furnished most of the money for several vehicles purchased during a cohabitating relationship was not barred by their cohabitation from bringing an unjust enrichment claim against the other cohabitant who retained control over the vehicles
• claims of plaintiff were “substantially independent of the nonmarital relationship of the parties and [were] not based on rights arising from their cohabitation”; thus, claim of unjust enrichment was permitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).