Spadaro v. United States Customs and Border Protection

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the trial court should have orally pronounced the $100 investigative cost, as it is a discretionary cost and not a mandatory'cost”
• striking the Public Defender fee and remanding for the trial court to advise defendant of the right to a hearing to contest it
• “[A] defect in an information is waived if no objection is timely made so long as the information does not wholly fail to state a crime.”
• “[T]he Public Defender fee should be struck because the trial court did not advise Appellant of his right to contest the fee when it was orally imposed.” (citing § 938.29(5), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.720(d)(1))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).