· 3/5/1917
Spada v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Citations
- 90 N.J.L. 338
- 100 A. 1071
- 1917 N.J. LEXIS 337
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- referring to its case as “the unusual circumstance in which withdrawal of the reference is appropriate”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.