Skip to main content
· 10/31/2000

Spackman Ex Rel. Spackman v. Board of Education

Citations

  • 2000 UT 87
  • 16 P.3d 533
  • 407 Utah Adv. Rep. 19
  • 2000 Utah LEXIS 148
  • 2000 WL 1634735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “court’s ability to award damages for violation of a self-executing provision rests on the common law”
  • holding that open education and due process clauses under Utah Constitution are self-executing and give rise to causes of action
  • holding that \court's ability to award damages for violation of a self-executing provision rests on the common law\
  • noting that Article I, Section 22, Article I, Section 9, and Article XII, Section 18 were previously held to be self-executing and holding that Article I, Section 7 and Article X, Section 1 are self-executing
  • limiting Bott v. DeLand, 922 P.2d 732, 739 (Utah 1996), which recognized a state Bivens action for cruel and unusual punishment violations
  • limiting Bott v. DeLand, 922 P.2d 732, 739 (Utah 1996), which recognized a state Bivens action for cruel and unusual punishment violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durrant, Howe, Russon, Durham, Wilkins, Durrant'S

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.