Space Age Engineering, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that inferences and allegations alone fail to fulfill the “clear and convincing proof’ required to show impropriety on the part of the government
• finding that inferences, suspicion and innuendo are insufficient to fulfill the clear and convincing proof required to show bias on the part of the government
• finding that inferences and allegations alone fail to fulfill the “clear and convincing proof’ required to show impropriety on the part of the government
• finding that inferences and allegations failed to constitute the “clear and convincing proof’ required to show impropriety on the part of the government
• finding that inferences and allegations alone fail to fulfill the “clear and convincing proof’ required to show impropriety on the part of the government
• recovery of bid costs allowed only upon clear and convincing proof that the award of the contract to another was arbitrary and ca pricious

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Space Age Engineering, Inc. v. United States

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Space Age Engineering, Inc. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1983-03-25· cited 6×
• Space Age Engineering, Inc. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1983-06-09· cited 2×
• Space Age Engineering, Inc. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1983-04-21· cited 1×