S.P. v. E.T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating when discussing effect of rules of practice that “[w]e have indicated that subject matter jurisdiction is, with certain constitutional exceptions not applicable here, a matter of statute, not judicial rule making”
• holding, in action bringing claims pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-119 and Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-29, that delay in implementing property revaluation was authorized by statute and that such delay did not result in an equal protection violation
• unequal distribution of tax burden is permissible so long as tax is adopted despite, and not because of, any adverse impact on more heavily taxed classes
• trial court should have permitted complaint to be amended posttrial to conform to proof during trial
• \ordinarily a court may not grant relief on the basis of an unpleaded claim\
• “where the trial court had in fact addressed a technically unpleaded claim that was actually litigated by the parties, it was improper for the Appellate Court to reverse the trial court’s judgment for lack of such an amendment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).