· 4/28/2009
SP Star Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
Citations
- 173 Cal. App. 4th 459
- 93 Cal. Rptr. 3d 152
- 2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 635
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an adult nude entertainment club’s argument that alcohol restrictions regulated speech lacked merit
- holding that an adult nude entertainment club's argument that alcohol restrictions regulated speech lacked merit
- holding that an adult nude enter- tainment club’s argument that alcohol restrictions regulated speech lacked merit
- holding that an adult nude enter- tainment club’s argument that alcohol restrictions regulated speech lacked merit
- explaining that the right to sell alcohol is “not a protected activity and does not involve a fundamental vested right”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.