· 2/25/2010
Sowell v. Chappius
Citations
- 695 F. Supp. 2d 16
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16776
- 2010 WL 743876
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A medical need is ‘serious’ for constitutional purposes if it presents ‘a condition of urgency’ that may result in ‘degeneration’ or ‘extreme pain.’ ”
- it is improper for the ALJ to act as the medical 17 expert
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: David G. Larimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.