Skip to main content
· 2/25/2010

Sowell v. Chappius

Citations

  • 695 F. Supp. 2d 16
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16776
  • 2010 WL 743876

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A medical need is ‘serious’ for constitutional purposes if it presents ‘a condition of urgency’ that may result in ‘degeneration’ or ‘extreme pain.’ ”
  • it is improper for the ALJ to act as the medical 17 expert

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David G. Larimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.