Sovereign Healthcare, LLC v. Mariner Healthcare Management Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that OCGA § 13-1-11 did not apply in action to enforce a contractual obligation to perform a service
• finding that definition of prejudgment interest “as a type of ‘actual damages’ incompatible with the recovery of liquidated damages . . . conflicts with the plain language of OCGA § 7-4-15”
• plain language of limited guaranty must be strictly construed and express terms cannot be extended
• where appellant objected to prejudgment interest on a number of grounds in the trial court, “but did not challenge the applicability of the statutory rate or alert the trial court to the different [contractual] rate,” it waived that argument on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).