Skip to main content
· 1/22/2013

Soverain Software LLC v. Newegg Inc.

Citations

  • 705 F.3d 1333
  • 105 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1732
  • 2013 WL 216406
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 1460

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that “the question of obviousness as a matter of law receives de novo determination on appeal”
  • finding that the use of use of hypertext to perform the known process of transmitting documents “was a routine incorporation of Internet technology into existing processes”
  • finding no commercial success where the claimed elec- tronic commerce system “was abandoned by its developers and almost all of its original users”
  • “The distinction proposed by Dr. Shamos and advanced by Soverain is not embodied in the claims and not reflected in the claim construction.”
  • invalidating as obvious claim 41, which depends from claim 15

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Prost, Reyna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.