Soutter v. Porter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the trial court was free to find that [expert] testimony lacked credibility and was, instead, speculative and deserving of little or no weight on [a] topic”
• finding that “the trial court was free to find that [expert] testimony lacked credibility and was, instead, speculative and deserving of little or no weight on [a] topic”
• finding trial court did not err in limiting plaintiffs recovery where trial court found expert’s testimony was speculative and deserving of little or no weight
• finding trial court did not err in limiting plaintiff’s recovery where trial court found expert’s testimony was speculative and deserving of little or no weight
• finding an appellate court defers to the trial court’s credibility determinations, that the trial court is “free to believe or disbelieve all or part of the witnesses’ testimony,” and that the trial court is free to assess the weight to be given to expert testimony
• finding an appellate court defers to the trial court’s credibility determinations, that the trial court is “free to believe or disbelieve all or part of the witnesses’ testimony,” and that the trial court is free to assess the weight to be given to expert testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).