Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. Danaher
Citations
- 238 U.S. 482
- 35 S. Ct. 886
- 59 L. Ed. 1419
- 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1580
Syllabus
<p>While it is not open in this court to revise the construction placed on a state statute by the state court, it is open to determine whether the application of the statute as so construed is so arbitrary as to so contravene the fundamental principles of justice as to amount to deprivation of property without due process of law.</p> <p>The rates of public service corporations, such as telephone companies, are fixed in expectation that they will be paid, and reasonable regulations tending towards prompt payment are necessary as the ability of such corporation to serve the public depends upon the prompt collection of their rates.</p> <p>Collection of such rates by legal process being practically- prohibitive, regulations requiring payment in advance are not unreasonable, and a telephone company is not subject to penalties for refusing to render service to a subscriber who is delinquent on past rates and refuses to pay in advance in accordance with an established rule uniformly enforced, or because it charges the full price to a subscriber who does not pay in advance while allowing a stated discount to those who do pay in advance.</p> <p>To enforce against a telephone company a penalty for refusing to furnish service under such conditions amounts to depriving it of its property without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.</p> <p>102 Arkansas, 547,.reversed.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- striking down a penalty imposed on a telephone company for refusing to refusing to provide service where such refusal had never been declared unlawful and was applied impartially
- a $6,300 statutory-damage award to a plaintiff whose telephone service was cut off for late payment violated the defendant’s due-process rights
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Devanter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.