Skip to main content
· 7/5/1979

Southwestern Iron & Steel Industries, Inc. v. State

Citations

  • 597 P.2d 981
  • 123 Ariz. 78
  • 1979 Ariz. LEXIS 299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The doctrine of ‘expressio unius’ is not to be applied where its application contradicts the general meaning of the statute or state public policy.”
  • “[E]xpression of one or more items of a class and the exclusion of other items of the same class implies ... intent to exclude those items not so included.”
  • “[T]he expression of one or more items of a class and the exclusion of other items of the same class implies the legislative intent to exclude those items not so included.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holohan, Cameron, Struckmeyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.