· 7/5/1979
Southwestern Iron & Steel Industries, Inc. v. State
Citations
- 597 P.2d 981
- 123 Ariz. 78
- 1979 Ariz. LEXIS 299
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The doctrine of ‘expressio unius’ is not to be applied where its application contradicts the general meaning of the statute or state public policy.”
- “[E]xpression of one or more items of a class and the exclusion of other items of the same class implies ... intent to exclude those items not so included.”
- “[T]he expression of one or more items of a class and the exclusion of other items of the same class implies the legislative intent to exclude those items not so included.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holohan, Cameron, Struckmeyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.