Southwestern Elec. Power Co. v. Burlington Northern Railroad Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim for restitution based on a theory of unjust enrichment was invalid absent any overcharges on the contract
• holding that an evidentiary ruling was not harmful because in light of other testimony and similar evidence, the excluded evidence would have been cumulative
• holding that objecting party waived appellate complaint regarding admission of evidence when it invited the alleged error by being the first party to introduce the allegedly objectionable evidence
• holding that it was “unable to locate any case in which an unjust enrichment remedy was allowed when the contested issue was governed by a valid contract”
• holding that objecting party waived appellate complaint regarding admission of evidence when it invited the alleged error by being the first party to introduce the allegedly objectionable evidence
• observing that overpay-ments under a contract can be recovered under a theory of restitution or unjust enrichment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).