Skip to main content
· 2/9/1989

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Wilson

Citations

  • 768 S.W.2d 755
  • 1989 Tex. App. LEXIS 327
  • 1988 WL 141973

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • but see Bradt v. West, 892 S.W2d 56, 76-77 (Tex. Ct. App. 1994) (client not automatically liable for tortious conduct of attorney)
  • no evidence Bell representatives could employ, direct and discharge servants, engage in performance of nondelegable duties of master, or manage any part of Bell's business
  • no evidence Bell representatives could employ, direct and discharge servants, engage in performance of nondelegable duties of master, or manage any part of Bell’s business
  • but see Bradt v. West , 892 S.W.2d 56, 76-77 (Tex. Ct. App. 1994) (client not automatically liable for tortious conduct of attorney)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nye, Benavides, Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.