Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Middlekamp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Rules of Superintendence are not meant “to alter basic substantive rights”
• stating that the Rules of Superintendence are not meant “to alter basic substantive rights”
• stating that the Rules of Superintendence are not meant “to alter basic substantive rights”
• finding R.C. 2945.72(C) did not apply where the defendant’s retained counsel did not appear for arraignment
• “The Rules of Superintendence are not designed to alter basic substantive rights of criminal defendants”
• the mandatory duty of complying with R.C. 2945.71 through 2945.73 is upon the prosecution and the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).