Southwest Marine, Inc., on Behalf of Universal Painting and Sandblasting Corp. v. United States of America and the United States Department of Navy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a nonparty could not be a “prevailing party” within the meaning of the EAJA
• concluding that “while not all claims involving maritime contracts are perforce CDA claims, plaintiffs who seek recovery in contract under the CDA must comply with its provisions”
• holding that a nonparty could not be a “prevailing party” under EAJA
• holding that a nonparty could not be a \prevailing party\ under EAJA
• explaining that the incorporation of the Vessels and Admiralty Acts into the Contract Disputes Act “does not alter the requirement that contract claims be presented to a Contracting Officer in the first instance”
• noting that under 8 41 U.S.C. § 607(g)(1)(A), contract board decisions are appealable to the U.S. Court of 9 Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and are not appealable to district courts unless they involve 10 maritime claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).