Skip to main content
· 6/2/1952

Southwest Lime Co. v. Lindley

Citations

  • 12 F.R.D. 484
  • 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3685

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding additional efforts unreasonable in part because they would produce “a list of credit card numbers and not a list of class members”
  • sending notice to larger group “would most likely confuse the recipients and encourage [responses] by non-class members”
  • Eisen represents “classic case” for individual notice where “records kept by defendants indisputably contained the names and addresses of the universe of class members.”
  • court held that it was not necessary to send individual notice to all those on an overinclusive list when there were no data which would enable the parties to determine who on the list was a class member

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.