· 10/11/1965
Southwest Engineering Co. v. United States
Citations
- 382 U.S. 819
- 86 S. Ct. 45
- 15 L. Ed. 2d 66
- 1965 U.S. LEXIS 626
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing recovery of unrealized profits “where the jury finds that with full disclosure [the plaintiff] would have retained [the stock] until the higher price gained by the wrongdoer was reached.”
- the liability of controlling persons “is governed neither by principles of agency nor conspiracy.” Id. at 738
- “[T]here is no duty to disclose information to one who reasonably should already be aware of it.”
- jury instructed to consider before determining damages whether upon full disclosure plaintiffs would have still sold but at a higher price or would have retained stock
- Section 20(a) requires “only some indirect means of discipline or influence short of actual direction to hold a ‘controlling person’ liable,” meaning that “ ‘control’ under the Act does not require knowledge of the specific wrongdoing”
- respondeat superior available in Third Circuit under facts of case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.