Skip to main content
· 10/11/1965

Southwest Engineering Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 382 U.S. 819
  • 86 S. Ct. 45
  • 15 L. Ed. 2d 66
  • 1965 U.S. LEXIS 626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing recovery of unrealized profits “where the jury finds that with full disclosure [the plaintiff] would have retained [the stock] until the higher price gained by the wrongdoer was reached.”
  • the liability of controlling persons “is governed neither by principles of agency nor conspiracy.” Id. at 738
  • “[T]here is no duty to disclose information to one who reasonably should already be aware of it.”
  • jury instructed to consider before determining damages whether upon full disclosure plaintiffs would have still sold but at a higher price or would have retained stock
  • Section 20(a) requires “only some indirect means of discipline or influence short of actual direction to hold a ‘controlling person’ liable,” meaning that “ ‘control’ under the Act does not require knowledge of the specific wrongdoing”
  • respondeat superior available in Third Circuit under facts of case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.