Southtrust Bank of Georgia v. Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing grant of summary judgment where questions of material fact remained as to forgery, even though holder was holder in due course
• reversing grant of summary judgment where questions of material fact remained as to forgery, even though holder was holder in due course
• noting in holder in due course case that “[f]raud in the factum most often arises where the obligor is asked to sign a document and he does so because he is deceived into believing that the document is something other than a negotiable instrument”
• noting in holder in due course case that “fraud in the factum most often arises where the obligor is asked to sign a document and he does so because he is deceived into believing that the document is something other than a negotiable instrument”
• bank, a holder in due course, sued maker of note, who raised defense of forgery of her signature; summary judgment for maker was reversed where fact issues remained as to whether maker ratified note

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).