Southgate Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a district court’s use of the phrase “direct result” needs no definition and is not a difficult term for a jury to understand
• “[Wjhere there is a separate action on the [insurance] coverage question, issues decided against the insurer’s interest in an underlying tort suit can have binding or estoppel effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).