Southfield v. Barrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that although the contract was illegal the plaintiff should be entitled to recover the balance due on the advance payment in addition to the agreed interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Asdourian v. Araj
  California Supreme Court· 1985-03-11· cited 101×
• Phillippe v. Shapell Industries, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 1987-10-29· cited 67×
• Marathon Entertainment, Inc. v. Blasi
  California Supreme Court· 2008-01-28· cited 61×
• Wong v. Tenneco, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 1985-07-29· cited 55×
• Dunkin v. Boskey
  California Court of Appeal· 2000-07-14· cited 55×
• Homestead Supplies, Inc. v. Executive Life Insurance
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-06-21· cited 51×
• Hiram Ricker & Sons v. Students International Meditation Society
  First Circuit· 1974-07-17· cited 34×
• Hiram Ricker & Sons v. Students International Meditation Society
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1975-07-24· cited 21×
• Eastland Financial Services v. Mendoza
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-01-25· cited 9×
• George Foreman Associates, Ltd. v. Foreman
  N.D. California· 1974-03-25· cited 8×
• St. John Farms, Inc. v. D. J. Irvin Co.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-04-08· cited 7×
• Calwood Structures, Inc. v. Herskovic
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-05-07· cited 5×
• Al-Ibrahim v. Edde
  District of Columbia· 1995-09-08· cited 4×
• Aghaian v. Minassian
  California Court of Appeal· 2021-05-24
• Kyablue v. Watkins
  California Court of Appeal· 2012-11-06
• Tak Chun Gaming Promotion Company Limited v. Long
  California Court of Appeal· 2023-10-26
• Tak Chun Gaming Promotion Company Limited v. Long
  California Court of Appeal· 2023-11-17

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tri-Q, Inc. v. Sta-Hi Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 1965-08-19· cited 85×
• Fomco, Inc. v. Joe Maggio, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 1961-01-24· cited 44×
• Emmons, Williams, Mires & Leech v. State Bar
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-04-13· cited 21×
• La Rosa v. Glaze
  California Court of Appeal· 1936-12-31· cited 10×
• Hainey v. Narigon
  California Court of Appeal· 1966-12-30· cited 8×
• California Chicks, Inc. v. Viebrock
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-09-22· cited 7×
• Griffis v. Squire
  California Court of Appeal· 1968-11-18· cited 3×