SOUTHERNMOST v. Torregrosa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the lower court's finding that Southernmost's investment in developing a podiatry practice in the Keys and recruiting Torregrosa for that practice constituted a legitimate business interest
• finding similar evidence supported trial court's proper finding that a non-compete was reasonably necessary
• trial court abused its discretion by reducing two-year restriction without a basis to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).