Southern Wine & Spirits of America, Inc. v. Division of Alcohol & Tobacco Control

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• courts of appeal owe the “Supreme Court’s considered dicta” nearly as much deference as “outright holdings”
• “A 30(b)(6) witness’s legal conclusions are not binding on the party who designated him, and a designee’s testimony likely does not bind [its employer] in the sense of a judicial admission.” (citation omitted)
• “A 30(b)(6) witness’s, legal conclusions are not binding on the party who designated him, and a designee’s testimony likely does not bind [its employer] in the sense of a judicial admission.” (citation omitted)
• “A 30(b)(6) witness’s legal conclusions are not binding on the party who designated him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).