SOUTHERN WALL PRODUCTS, INC. v. STEVEN E. BOLIN and DEBORAH BOLIN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing “the peculiar constitutional status of noncitizens apprehended at a port-of-entry, but permitted to temporarily enter the United States under specific conditions”
• affirming preliminary injunction 9 providing bond hearings to class of persons referred to immigration court after being found to 10 have a credible fear of persecution
• upholding portion of the injunction “requiring that [section 1225(b)(1)(B)(ii)] detainees receive bond hearings” but remanding for “further factual development and consideration of the procedures that must be followed with respect to the required bond hearings”
• determining the “balance of the equities and public interest favors plaintiffs”
• “[O]nce a person is standing on U.S. soil— regardless of the legality of his or her entry—he or she is entitled to due process.”
• “Congress intended [the anti-injunction provision] to prohibit injunctive relief with respect to organizational plaintiffs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).