Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Kempthorne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the children in Plain had a “unique interest ... in the apportionment of damages which conflicted with their stepmother’s” interest.
• holding issue not urgent when potential intervenors can re-raise legal claims if BLM rules against them on remand
• concluding the issue was not urgent where potential intervenors can re-raise legal claims if BLM issues unsatisfactory decision on remand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).