Skip to main content
· 5/23/1996

Southern Tank & Equipment Co. v. Zartic, Inc.

Citations

  • 471 S.E.2d 587
  • 221 Ga. App. 503
  • 30 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 54
  • 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 2190
  • 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the predominant purpose of a contract containing both sale and non-sale aspects was the sale of goods in part because the portion of the cost attributable to non-sale elements was less than one-half of the total contract price
  • noting that “[w]hen the predominant element of a contract is the sale of goods, the contract is viewed as a sales contract and the UCC applies even though a substantial amount of service is to be rendered in installing the goods”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beasley, Birdsong, Blackburn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.