· 5/23/1996
Southern Tank & Equipment Co. v. Zartic, Inc.
Citations
- 471 S.E.2d 587
- 221 Ga. App. 503
- 30 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 54
- 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 2190
- 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 543
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the predominant purpose of a contract containing both sale and non-sale aspects was the sale of goods in part because the portion of the cost attributable to non-sale elements was less than one-half of the total contract price
- noting that “[w]hen the predominant element of a contract is the sale of goods, the contract is viewed as a sales contract and the UCC applies even though a substantial amount of service is to be rendered in installing the goods”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beasley, Birdsong, Blackburn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.