Skip to main content
· 5/22/1916

Southern Railway Co. v. Gray

Citations

  • 241 U.S. 333
  • 36 S. Ct. 558
  • 60 L. Ed. 1030
  • 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1759

Syllabus

<p>Contradictory statements made by a witness prior to his examination in the case can have no legal tendency to establish the truth of their subject-matter.</p> <p>Rights and obligations under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act depend upon that Act and applicable principles of common law as interpreted and applied in Federal courts.</p> <p>In an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, negligence by the employer is essential to a recovery, and where there is no evidence to show why a brakeman, sent to guard his train, should lie down and go to sleep on the track within a short distance of a curve, negligence cannot be imputed to the engineer of an approaching passenger train for not stopping his train before striking him, it appearing that the distance from the curve was less than that in which a train could be stopped even if a light could have been seen.</p> <p>The engineer of an approaching train, on seeing the lights of a brakeman sent out to guard the latter’s train, has a right to presume that the brakeman is standing on guard and he does not owe such brakeman a duty to immediately stop his train so as to avoid hitting him.</p>

Judges: McReynolds

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.